Editorial Commentary: Open Versus Arthroscopic Biceps Tenodesis—You Choose
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
All-Arthroscopic Suprapectoral versus Open Subpectoral Tenodesis of the Long Head of the Biceps Brachii
BACKGROUND Pathologic changes of the long head of the biceps tendon are a recognized source of shoulder pain in adults that can be treated with tenotomy or tenodesis when nonoperative measures are not effective. It is not clear whether arthroscopic or open biceps tenodesis has a clinical advantage. HYPOTHESIS Pain relief and shoulder function after all-arthroscopic suprapectoral biceps tenode...
متن کاملArthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair With Mini-open Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis
With a range of tear characteristics such as chronicity, degree of fatty atrophy, and number of tendons involved as well as varying patient-specific characteristics including age, injury mechanism, and expectations after treatment to consider, proper and successful treatment of a rotator cuff tear is multifactorial and, consequently, challenging. Although conservative management of a rotator cu...
متن کاملArthroscopic biceps tenodesis.
Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis is indicated for the treatment of severe biceps tendonopathy, partial- or full-thickness tendon tears, or biceps instability typically associated with rotator cuff tear, although there has been considerable debate on tenotomy versus tenodesis. We advocate tenodesis, for the following reasons: to re-establish the resting muscle length so as to avoid scaring and spas...
متن کاملArthroscopic Treatment of Biceps Tendinopathy
■ The dimensions of the bicipital groove vary along its mean 5-cm length. At its entrance, the width ranges from 9 to 12 mm, and the depth is about 2.2 mm. In its midportion, the groove narrows to a mean width of 6.2 mm, whereas its depth remains comparable at approximately 2.4 mm. This considerable groove narrowing may contribute to entrapment of a hypertrophic intra-articular component, refer...
متن کاملArthroscopic versus open acromioplasty: a meta-analysis.
BACKGROUND To address persisting controversy in the literature concerning the efficacy of arthroscopic compared to open acromioplasty, a meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the treatment effect after both approaches. HYPOTHESIS The final clinical outcomes will be the same after both open and arthroscopic acromioplasty. However, the arthroscopic technique results in faster recovery and les...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery
سال: 2016
ISSN: 0749-8063
DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2015.12.017